Does corruption control undermine fairness and stability in society?

Muhammed Ali, Acting Assistant Director, Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau, Singapore gave this presentation in Bangkok, Thailand:

In Singapore we have a very strong anti-corruption policy which recognises that corruption control:
a. has a strategic significance in national development;
b. provides a source of competitive advantage. Investors are happy doing business
if there is an efficient, clean and transparent environment without being
encumbered by bribery;
c. is part and parcel of good governance for the common good of the citizens;
d. contributes to the meritocratic ideal, levelling the playing field because unchecked corruption has the following detrimental effects;
e. distorts accepted and cherished values, particularly achievement orientedness and diligence;
f. undermines fairness and stability in society;
g. subverts the course of justice and weakens the rule of law especially if bribes are paid to prevent law enforcement, there will be contempt and hostility towards authority

I think e through f make corruption control appear like a bad idea. Even though this is likely an error, I believe, Thaksin also thought corruption control was bad for Thailand!